Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05

[Martin Bjorklund <[e-mail]>]

tom petch <[e-mail]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Bjorklund" <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 7:52 AM
> >
> > Thanks for catching these, all addressed in -06.
> 
> Martin
> 
> That was quick!
> 
> But ...
> -05 had
> "        in RFC 2119 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119)."
> which looked like plain text which is right for a YANG module
> -06 has
> "       as described in BCP 14 [RFC 2119] [RFC8174] when "
> which looks like XML/HTML and not plain text, which is not right for a
> YANG module.

Hmm, RFC 8366 has:

     described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they

in the YANG module.

ieft-schema-mount currently has 

     described in BCP 14 [RFC 2119] [RFC 8174] when, and only when, they

... but has not yet reached the RFC editor.


I suggest that I bring this up with the RFC editor for
ieft-schema-mount, and use whatever they suggest for ieft-schema-mount
also in this document.



/martin


> 
> My other points are addressed.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> >
> > /martin
> >
> > tom petch <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > > Daniele
> > >
> > > Some non-technical comments
> > >
> > > IANA Considerations seems not to register ietf-alarms-x733
> > >
> > > X.721 is referenced in the module but not in I-D References
> > >
> > > YANG module quotes RFC2119 but not RFC8174
> > >
> > > Dates in examples are 2015 - 2018 might give a better impression
> > >
> > > Tom Petch
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Daniele Ceccarelli" <[e-mail]>
> > > To: "Daniele Ceccarelli" <[e-mail]>;
> > > <[e-mail]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:32 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > > Working group,
> > > >
> > > > The last call is now concluded. I take the lack of comments as a
> "we
> > > already
> > > > discussed a lot this draft during its life as WG document" and
> hence
> > > proceed
> > > > with the request for publication.
> > > >
> > > > Even if among the authors we have a huge level of competence in
> YANG
> > > > modelling we'll request for a YANG doctors review as a pair of
> fresh
> > > eyes is
> > > > in any case helpful.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Daniele
> > > >
> > > > From: CCAMP <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Daniele
> Ceccarelli
> > > > Sent: den 7 november 2018 12:18
> > > > To: CCAMP ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
> > > > Subject: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Working group,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to the fast IPR replies from the authors we're ready to
> start a
> > > two
> > > > weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05.
> > > >
> > > > The last call ends on Wednesday November 21st . Please send you
> > > comments to
> > > > the CCAMP mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > Also comments along the lines of "I've reviewed the draft and
> believe
> > > it's
> > > > ready for publication" are valuable.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Authors, please threat pending comments as part of the last call
> ones.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been
> > > collected
> > > > and can be found in the history of the document:
> > > >
> > >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/history/
> > > >
> > > > Please note that no IPR has been disclosed against the document.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Daniele, Fatai, Oscar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > --------
> > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CCAMP mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CCAMP mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> > >
>