[CCAMP]Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

[[e-mail]]

Ciao Daniele, ciao all,

Sorry for the late response but, FWIW, I support this I-D and believe 
it's ready to move forward.

Thanks,

Julien


On 12/11/2024 17:15:19 "Daniele Ceccarelli \(dceccare\)" 
<dceccare=[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi working group,
>
> Just  a kind reminder.
>
> Thanks
>
> Daniele
>
> *From:*Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) 
> <dceccare=[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 22, 2024 2:01 PM
>
> Hi CCAMP,
>
> -- IMPORTANT PREAMBLE--
>
> We have two drafts which have a very good level of maturity, namely 
> RFC9093bis and Optical Impairment aware topology.
>
> The more we work on them and the more disparate use cases pop up. We 
> requested the authors to have the drafts in a status that is “good 
> enough” to address the vast majority of use cases supported by the 
> industry today so that we can progresse the drafts to the next stage 
> and not hold them potentially for ever.
>
> With the actual version of the drafts we should be able to cover all 
> of the use cases with only the following limitations:
>
>   * Homogenous muxponders: with the present version of the draft we
>     are not able to support use cases of interoperability between
>     muxponder of different versions, and we can use regenerator always
>     at the lowest level (OTU) since we do not have client information
>     when setting up a tunnel. This information is missing today.
>   * Client mapping compatibility: at the moment we can support optical
>     compatibility with operational model, but we don’t support client
>     compatibility.
>
> These use cases and others that might come to your mind, if really 
> needed, can be handled by an update to the RFCs at later stages.
>
> - END PREAMBLE --
>
> That said, this starts a 3 weeks working group last call on 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11.
>
> The last call will last 3 weeks to provide more time for reviewing, 
> given we’re approaching IETF 121 meeting. It will end on Tuesday 
> November 12^th . Please indicate your support or concern to the 
> mailing list. Review comments and nits are also welcome.
>
> All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been 
> collected and can be found in the CCAMP WIKI page: 
> https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/ccamp
>
> If anyone is willing to be the shepherd for this draft, please feel 
> free to volunteer (authors excluded).
>
> Thanks
>
> Daniele, Fatai, Luis
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.