[CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3
"Gruman, Fred" <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com> Mon, 07 January 2013 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B7911E80C5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:24:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q48TBJA5awzD for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:24:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fncnmp04.fnc.fujitsu.com (fncnmp04.fnc.fujitsu.com [168.127.0.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8CA11E80AD for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,424,1355119200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="25751795"
Received: from rchexhcp2.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.76]) by fncnmp02.fnc.fujitsu.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Jan 2013 10:24:17 -0600
Received: from RCHEXMBP2.fnc.net.local ([169.254.1.67]) by RCHEXHCP2.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:24:17 -0600
From: "Gruman, Fred" <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3
Thread-Index: Ac3s82+y8vO2F259QmKlwmEkZgQsmg==
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:24:16 +0000
Message-ID: <5DF87403A81B0C43AF3EB1626511B2923C3031BF@RCHEXMBP2.fnc.net.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [168.127.136.253]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19516.000
x-tm-as-result: No--29.007600-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5DF87403A81B0C43AF3EB1626511B2923C3031BFRCHEXMBP2fncnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3, signaling-g709v3
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:24:19 -0000
Hi Fatai, Daniele, I noticed that in the latest routing draft of ospf-g709v3-04 that the switching capability was changed from 101 to 110. The latest signaling draft signaling-g709v3-05 still lists 101 as the switching type (in section 4) although it does defer to [OTN-OSPF]. I assume that the switching capability/type is to be consistent between routing and signaling and that the new recommendation is 110. Is this correct? If so, I would recommend removing the "(101, TBA by IANA)" from the signaling draft and rely on the reference to [OTN-OSPF]. Thanks, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g7… Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g709v3… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Switching Capability/Type for ospf-g7… Fatai Zhang