Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01

Daniele Ceccarelli <> Tue, 02 April 2019 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2BA1200FE for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 05:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKq7g4uQ0hcN for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 05:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF5A1200C1 for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 05:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CdhkvcdbggsFRgcrIprcI5whi/loQ3Ajw4Rl8HGi3no=; b=BZ07HPyezOwNWHZY5+7Nb1EMUP0I65ploezPcvchNhTywikY19Jkkh5uX4sEwtoaodZRHH8+1PtLDH2AZNyFG7si6ERozqPw5CUARjKNfVtbdLdETM7twCEsfAbcAnN3Kz5+nRcsNUG/eqnm5nPVlQZc3Vn9pf4Mu7AGViKl4/8=
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.8; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:46:30 +0000
Received: from ([fe80::1152:d74:3cb2:5537]) by ([fe80::1152:d74:3cb2:5537%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.011; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:46:30 +0000
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <>
To: tom petch <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
Thread-Index: AdTokK+vn1DgGsI+TZaZNiPisf8ojgAwQuEA
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:46:29 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <091501d4e948$a188c800$>
In-Reply-To: <091501d4e948$a188c800$>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-originating-ip: []
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a33159df-6708-4f8b-0854-08d6b7693a7b
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:VI1PR07MB3935;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR07MB3935:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-forefront-prvs: 0995196AA2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(346002)(396003)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(53936002)(8936002)(8676002)(476003)(6506007)(53546011)(446003)(11346002)(76176011)(7696005)(97736004)(74316002)(6436002)(26005)(305945005)(7736002)(110136005)(99286004)(102836004)(52536014)(55016002)(86362001)(44832011)(9686003)(186003)(105586002)(106356001)(5660300002)(81166006)(486006)(81156014)(6306002)(6246003)(2906002)(68736007)(33656002)(229853002)(6116002)(3846002)(966005)(14454004)(2501003)(66066001)(296002)(71190400001)(316002)(256004)(14444005)(478600001)(71200400001)(99936001)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB3935;; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JQin/uPXpY34K7yCVyuuKcgYY3+FIk+3AF5QottHVALZfFLiN0ikT5s93nHfbzFCepoBWNtFlmDLiLfH6lIJYEzQA35ViD/U6+oghjN7r4oPTSBF5udx+2A2tds9iA3uC3EdDPLkkRO7pEOKuFgyBONaVHAVRfAhxXK+6dY4YZDmuLHjH28S++sCUOhTcLEX6P9pUToufIFVBXX/Uimru1cwRKg9MHT6vqRLC9KJeyjmr+7s1Lqs2TEXgQsV0KS9yAl6JJWBfb2C0GDrryrM+Ni3Mt2rKB2L38dVtCI8gf59gZkgDJ5H2Ci37D4G46wSHu6Qj5z1OrIdqURru6cgBPiCQTbOFtVIiH6246Qy7XVJR4+ZjrOxkIykRRY5VOr9dt14XUc0lJx/l63nNjeYmzPLKbT9Uilr22KQrgnlE44=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01D4E962.DA34B0A0"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a33159df-6708-4f8b-0854-08d6b7693a7b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Apr 2019 12:46:29.8623 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB3935
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:46:37 -0000

Hi Tom,

agree with you. The plan is, if adopted, to work on a -01 version and liaise that one. 
We need add text to explicitly say what our understanding is and to get the blessing from ITU-T, so that the draft will be the reference for our future work and we won't fall in the issue of having different people having different understanding of ITU-T recommendations. 



-----Original Message-----
From: tom petch <> 
Sent: den 2 april 2019 13:42
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <>om>;
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01

To quote the I-D

   As this description is arbitrarily proposed by the authors to cover
   a lack of information in IETF and ITU-T, a liaison request to ITU-T
   is needed.

Yes, I see that a liaison is needed after which the draft may or may not need substatial revision.  Is this I-D the best way to liaise what needs liaising, buried as it is in YANG.  And adoption in this state seems premature since it might bake in assumptions that later prove unfortunate and hinder resolution - nothing specific in mind, just a worry.

I never see much difference between working on an unadopted I-D and an adopted one so see scope for progress - e.g. Normative References - even if it is not adopted at this moment in time..

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniele Ceccarelli" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 2:44 PM

Working group,

This is the first time we manage to have all the IPR declarations from so many authors in so little time…good progresses 😊

Hence we can start a one week poll on making
draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01 a CCAMP working group document.

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support" and a motivation for  your reply, mandatory for the "not support" and nice to have for the "support".

The polling will end on Monday April 8th .


Daniele & Fatai

(Please note that we’re running a single week polling instead of the classical 2 weeks as we would like to include the draft, if adopted, in a liaison to ITU-T SG15)


> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list