Re: Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks

Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com> Tue, 02 September 2008 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE91A28C193 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tICS5LLIeLn0 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119C628C189 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KaXTv-0007hi-Ur for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:07:47 +0000
Received: from [66.226.64.47] (helo=pro46.abac.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <gregb@grotto-networking.com>) id 1KaXTr-0007hE-HU for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:07:45 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.131] (c-71-202-41-42.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.41.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by pro46.abac.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m82F6kkm028401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gregb@grotto-networking.com)
Message-ID: <48BD5687.1010008@grotto-networking.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:06:47 -0700
From: Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
CC: ccamp@ops.ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks
References: <0a8601c909f4$7c014ce0$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
In-Reply-To: <0a8601c909f4$7c014ce0$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>

Hi Adrian and WGs, looking at the ITU-T SG 15's Optical work plan. They 
put an emphasis on Metro Optical Networks and point out that these can 
be different from long haul networks in that that they may not need to 
use regenerators and that these may be significantly more "dynamic" with 
respect to provisioning than long haul DWDM networks. 
We should point them at CCAMP's  WSON work which includes both the 
Framework document and the RWA info model document.  The modeling of 
asymmetric switches such as ROADMs seems to have been overlooked at the 
ITU-T.

Regards

Greg

Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We received a liaison back in February 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/425/) asking for our comments on 
> ITU-T Study Group 15's "Optical Transport Networks & Technologies 
> Standardization Work Plan" 
> (http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com15/otn/index.html)
>
> Please let me know by Friday September 5th if you have any comments 
> you would like us to make. If I don't receive anything, I will send a 
> response to thank them for keeping us informed and asking them to 
> share any future work plans with us.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>

-- 
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237