[CCAMP] The thing I forgot about draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 30 July 2013 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3758021F9C46 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvEXrJxrhbY6 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A521F9931 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6UFlX78019495 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:47:33 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-13f0.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.19.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6UFlW0q019468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:47:33 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:47:31 +0100
Message-ID: <029601ce8d3c$1a76cab0$4f646010$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac6NO/KVe3imLWGiRZmFI8XWdhHCOQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [CCAMP] The thing I forgot about draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:47:41 -0000

Hi,

Sorry about my senility just now.

The point I made was please rename the new ERO subobject to avoid confusion
about using the referenced LSP as a tunnel or a stitching segment.

The point I forgot was to wonder whether there is a category of "best effort"
that follows most of the referenced LSP but not all hops?
Following that, what if there are specific hops in the referenced LSP that MUST
be followed and others that only SHOULD be followed?

Cheers,
Adrian