Re: [CCAMP] OAM in LSP stitching

David Mozes <davidm@mellanox.com> Sat, 02 August 2014 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <davidm@mellanox.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9161A07AB for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAsTaVDt_K2q for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3lrp0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D231A06B5 for <CCAMP@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AMXPR05MB0600.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.67.23) by AMXPR05MB0598.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.67.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.14; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:09:04 +0000
Received: from AMXPR05MB0600.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.67.23]) by AMXPR05MB0600.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.67.23]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.014; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:09:04 +0000
From: David Mozes <davidm@mellanox.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "CCAMP@ietf.org" <CCAMP@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] OAM in LSP stitching
Thread-Index: AQHPrjmBujz0zZ8UuUqhgG6mloO605u9JpEA
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:09:03 +0000
Message-ID: <7696983661ef4a67b41d41429d2287f8@AMXPR05MB0600.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <03d9166915b9407cb1e2655108d3d413@AMXPR05MB0600.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <53DCB83F.4070206@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <53DCB83F.4070206@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [213.57.242.47]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
x-forefront-prvs: 029174C036
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199002)(377454003)(13464003)(252514010)(51704005)(377424004)(24454002)(80022001)(79102001)(19580395003)(99396002)(20776003)(81542001)(15975445006)(46102001)(76176999)(81342001)(101416001)(74662001)(54356999)(66066001)(64706001)(31966008)(86362001)(76482001)(92566001)(95666004)(74316001)(107046002)(83322001)(74502001)(4396001)(83072002)(33646002)(106356001)(85852003)(87936001)(50986999)(19580405001)(107886001)(76576001)(105586002)(2656002)(106116001)(77982001)(21056001)(85306004)(24736002)(108616003); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:AMXPR05MB0598; H:AMXPR05MB0600.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/J-u0xrU1qSWjcig6xRlXpjGz-zI
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] OAM in LSP stitching
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:09:09 -0000

Thx  Loa  , 
That  my thought  as well . 
I wonder  whether  there are other  ways  ..
Since this could be an issue 


David   

-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] 
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2014 1:07 PM
To: David Mozes; CCAMP@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] OAM in LSP stitching

David,

For packet LSPs, forwarding done on an MPLS label, this is possible based on the TTL expiring. I don't think this possible for other types of LSPs.

/Loa

On 2014-08-02 09:49, David Mozes wrote:
> Hi
>
> I like to know whether  today there is  a way to receive   OAM packets
> (BFD,LSP Ping .. )  on the stitching  point  on the same LSP FEC  of 
> the stitching LSP ?
>
> Thx
>
> David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64