IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on [draft-merge-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-01]

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 14 February 2019 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B12A1289FA; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:41:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDeaXtrOHcjc; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:41:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7051288BD; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1EIf3Sd013610; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:41:27 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B5E22048; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:41:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE7422044; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:41:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.189.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1EIfPrc021995 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:41:25 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Fatai Zhang' <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-merge-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org
References: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8ACC632C8@dggeml530-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8ACC632C8@dggeml530-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:41:23 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <02de01d4c494$e33767d0$a9a63770$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02DF_01D4C494.E33A4E00"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQK85WCOqWRuuYtTeU/IK8P5ujpuoKQPXCUg
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.189.92
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24430.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.798-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.798-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24430.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--21.798000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 0dFPYP4mu5TxIbpQ8BhdbKIjfGE5qvnLkT7cMJfe6JvjsTquy0JRi9I7 W+voMn3qyG46ZMmHTuORpAev6dLzAvnVY0DWsTq3BFtTtfRjLMH2acON9Q+rnkX5hc8ioB2+17V 4hYpuLbMQSK75DSbBzubGqBsFMykQ22QCMggrtxzvVbHa5Rs8t0OvwxWboMrdu/zUE1SNSPnGyv qbtGWMEQR1ZtMYefFWPC7j/mzpDFrd4xdn1XD3c0OZWaJBszmqEsPHM6iHL3YUtdRZTmEaIfMxs +ucp3ZM//nkqRz73/pz3XExg2oeRYGSNZ+mjVM23/BiYwVwlIhar2Wff4KSISeU9ni3W5GKUdfE Kc10rU5YmOIE+kgdJLZqxAW+OsVVC4+rppBRJ3YZS5uxXPxN6TPYPmH3aiShw7+XQ3Lk9nkXhjM CrsVyAih8Zk4WjkhkFABeLgZr0ZEfE8yM4pjsDzl/1fD/GopdyJ1gFgOMhOmYj59oOLB2GmF5X5 yuwTohK9a52FTwikKnNJ+qajiGWSmuTz8tUfLsTahmBD6VwDK8nLCL/4Ms9A==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/J5JyEcC95l_aIH0hgB_8YzPez3g>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on [draft-merge-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-01]
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:41:37 -0000

Who'd have thought that G.709 published in 2012 would become out of date and
that bandwidth capabilities (and demands) would continue to grow?

 

Seems obvious that GMPLS should be able to handle ODUCn, CCAMP is the place
to do that work, and that this draft is a good starting point.

 

So, yes, I support adoption.

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Fatai Zhang
Sent: 13 February 2019 08:29
To: 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-merge-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability@ietf.org;
ccamp-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on
[draft-merge-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-01]

 

 

Hi all,

We now have the IPR declaration replies from all the authors/contributors
and no IPR was disclosed against -00,which is the same as -01 except the
date.

This starts a two weeks poll on making
[draft-merge-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-01] a CCAMP working group
document.

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support" and a motivation for your reply, mandatory for the "not support"
and nice to have for the "support".

The polling ends on February 27th , 2019.

 

Thanks

Fatai & Daniele

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email