[CCAMP] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-06: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 22 May 2018 19:22 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889DA12E9DC; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework@ietf.org, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, ccamp@ietf.org, zhoutianran@huawei.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152701695046.31338.17571834803011971899.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:22:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/JRwjcUzF6zuZ0KzyCDWyrZF2sKU>
Subject: [CCAMP] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 19:22:33 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for a well written and understandable document. Please also see Tianran Zhou's OpDir review at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework-05-opsdir-lc-zhou-2018-04-20/ I have some nits to help improve readability further -- the HTML / rich version is here: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D3500 draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework.txt:125 "multiple gigabits in traditional frequency bands and beyond 10 gigabits in higher frequency bands with more band width." band width vs bandwidth draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework.txt:153 " there are advantages if radio link interfaces can be modeled and be managed using the same structure and the same approach, " Readability: I'd suggest "can be modeled and managed using..." draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework.txt:314 " solution is network management system(NMS), while an emerging one is SDN. " is *a* network management system (NMS) draft-ietf-ccamp-microwave-framework.txt:342 " If nodes from different vendors shall be managed by the same SDN controller via a node management interface (north bound interface," I think that this would be better as: "If nodes from different vendors will be managed by the same" or "If nodes from different vendors are to be managed by the same"
- [CCAMP] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-iet… Warren Kumari
- Re: [CCAMP] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft… Yemin (Amy)