Fw: [OSPF] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-05.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 24 November 2008 14:24 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C5D3A690B for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:24:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oli99Ybqw3ji for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1C93A683A for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1L4cFi-000EMD-9H for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:17:26 +0000
Received: from [62.128.201.249] (helo=asmtp2.iomartmail.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1L4cFd-000ELX-JM for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:17:23 +0000
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mAOEHHr6025679 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:17:18 GMT
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAOEHGL6025663 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:17:17 GMT
Message-ID: <03A5339A999247849861E8DB3D331DB3@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Fw: [OSPF] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-05.txt
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:17:12 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>
Hi CCAMP, This last call in the OSPF working group may be of interest to you. Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Acee Lindem" <acee@redback.com> To: "OSPF List" <ospf@ietf.org> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:09 PM Subject: [OSPF] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-05.txt > This starts the WG last for "Advertising a Router's Local Addresses > in OSPF TE Extensions" - draft-ietf-ospf-te-node-addr-05.txt. It will > conclude on Monday, December 8th, 2008 at 12:00 AM. > > This document was previously WG last called about 2 years back. We > delayed advancing it in our to align with the ASON requirements. With > the addition of the IPv4 and IPv6 prefix length, we now feel it will > be usable for ASCON as well. > > Thanks, > Acee & Abhay > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >
- Fw: [OSPF] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ospf-te-nod… Adrian Farrel