RE: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D

<> Thu, 07 August 2008 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923D83A6942 for <>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.837
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.692, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ffFXuLtbW1K for <>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FB73A6872 for <>; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1KR01h-0008E6-JW for; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:35:13 +0000
Received: from [] ( by with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1KR01d-0008DY-QI for; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:35:11 +0000
Received: from ([]) by with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:35:05 +0200
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Subject: RE: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:35:04 +0200
Message-ID: <7DBAFEC6A76F3E42817DF1EBE64CB02605C595A5@ftrdmel2>
In-Reply-To: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Thread-Topic: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D
Thread-Index: Acj3GSqnGDEdvJJ9Q+KhIJRfVyBxhwBRnHVQ
References: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
From: <>
To: <>, <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Aug 2008 07:35:05.0379 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C342F30:01C8F860]
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <>


In favor of WG topic.


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel


draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-info-03.txt was discussed in Dublin and seemed to 
be pretty mature.

Note that despite the file name, the content of this document is consistent 
with its title: "Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for 
Wavelength Switched Optical Networks." That is, the scope is limited to the 
information model for RWA.

Can we have your opinion, please, on whether this document is ready to be 
adopted as a working group I-D.

Adrian and Deborah