Re: [CCAMP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7281202DA; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 03:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VR8FTTV2cWNN; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 03:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA5D1200B8; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 03:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1BECACB0D36E9A6470C6; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:11:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.39) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:11:14 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.72]) by dggemm422-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:11:11 +0800
From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org>, "Daniele Ceccarelli" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU7dK1/FzfYqDi8E+cPHiQb+sbNKYyClfQ
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:11:10 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FCFBD6829@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <155470422974.18254.18244907474058589870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155470422974.18254.18244907474058589870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.169.30.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/LfFOQV7ldFy2yEbatZI8oEE0jEU>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 10:11:19 -0000

Hi Barry,

Thanks for the comments. The draft will updated to address the comment, and fix the nits. 

BR,
Amy
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2019 2:17 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>;; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

— Section 3.1 —

      When the Availability TLV is included, it MUST be present along
      with the Ethernet Bandwidth Profile TLV.

I had to read this a couple of time to get it.  I suggest that this reads a bit better:

NEW
When the Availability TLV is included,  the Ethernet Bandwidth Profile TLV MUST also be included.
END

There’s also a nit in the description of “Availability”: “1and” is missing a space.

— Section 3.2 —

   When a node receives Availability TLVs which mixed of zero index and
   non-zero index,

Nit: “...TLVs with a mix of zero index...”

Nit later in the section: change “there're are” to “there are”.