Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling

Leeyoung <> Fri, 01 August 2014 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE96D1A014E for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.202
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_NK_qOEPDR6 for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DD81A0143 for <>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BHU45966; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 03:30:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 04:30:51 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:30:41 -0700
From: Leeyoung <>
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
Thread-Index: Ac+rXdFAjNn+1/4gRVGf5hQhUm4haQB2s9xg
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 03:30:40 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 03:30:56 -0000

Hi Matt,

Thanks for your comments. As Giovanni expressed, in the upcoming revision has designated a place for experimental values. And your suggestion on "TBD" for some error subcodes make sense to me as well. There are apparently parallel efforts for similar codes. 


-----Original Message-----
From: CCAMP [] On Behalf Of Matt Hartley (mhartley)
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:06 PM
Subject: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling


A couple of things on the IANA section in this doc. I'm not actually sure what the right thing to do is in either case - perhaps the Chairs could offer guidance if need be?

First: in the new "Values for Wavelength Assignment Method field in WavelengthSelection Sub-TLV" registry, would it be worth specifying a small range of values for Experimental Use (or any of the other categories, for that matter)? Note that I don't have any proposal for what might be done with these; I'm just thinking that they may come in useful in the future.

Second: the new Path-error subcodes in this doc have been assigned values already (not even marked as "suggested". Have you got early allocation of these? Or should they become TBD until IANA formally assigns them? Just wondering, since we're going through the same stuff with the SRLG-collection draft...



CCAMP mailing list