From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>,
 "draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@tools.ietf.org"
 <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
Thread-Index: Ac+rXdFAjNn+1/4gRVGf5hQhUm4haQB2s9xg
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 03:30:40 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C07BEA@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A00D35@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A00D35@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/MrpKT3c5DvrLz9LEes_fbIyMMp0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
Precedence: list

Hi Matt,

Thanks for your comments. As Giovanni expressed, in the upcoming revision h=
as designated a place for experimental values. And your suggestion on "TBD"=
 for some error subcodes make sense to me as well. There are apparently par=
allel efforts for similar codes.=20

Thanks,
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hartley (mhar=
tley)
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:06 PM
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling

Authors,

A couple of things on the IANA section in this doc. I'm not actually sure w=
hat the right thing to do is in either case - perhaps the Chairs could offe=
r guidance if need be?

First: in the new "Values for Wavelength Assignment Method field in Wavelen=
gthSelection Sub-TLV" registry, would it be worth specifying a small range =
of values for Experimental Use (or any of the other categories, for that ma=
tter)? Note that I don't have any proposal for what might be done with thes=
e; I'm just thinking that they may come in useful in the future.

Second: the new Path-error subcodes in this doc have been assigned values a=
lready (not even marked as "suggested". Have you got early allocation of th=
ese? Or should they become TBD until IANA formally assigns them? Just wonde=
ring, since we're going through the same stuff with the SRLG-collection dra=
ft...

Cheers

Matt=20

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp