[CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 06 April 2019 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93DB120126; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module@ietf.org, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, ccamp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <155458648675.21847.15882795962444550355.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:34:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/MuWOQ09VN51bxEZKtd2Gxqz_jys>
Subject: [CCAMP] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-ccamp-alarm-module-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 21:34:47 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Easy to read and well-thought except for "shelving" alarms, it took me a while
to understand that it was like "stashing" ;-)

Section 3.4, may I assume that the document fixes the problem "X.733 and
especially 3GPP were not really clear on this point." ?

Perhaps did I miss the part where the alarm system could also fails: what
alarm? status? does it generate? Or is it out of scope?

*minor NITS*
Section 1 s/north-bound/northbound/ ?