[CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 06 April 2019 21:34 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93DB120126; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module@ietf.org, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, ccamp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <155458648675.21847.15882795962444550355.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:34:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/MuWOQ09VN51bxEZKtd2Gxqz_jys>
Subject: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 21:34:47 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Easy to read and well-thought except for "shelving" alarms, it took me a while to understand that it was like "stashing" ;-) Section 3.4, may I assume that the document fixes the problem "X.733 and especially 3GPP were not really clear on this point." ? Perhaps did I miss the part where the alarm system could also fails: what alarm? status? does it generate? Or is it out of scope? *minor NITS* Section 1 s/north-bound/northbound/ ?
- [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i… Martin Bjorklund