Re: [CCAMP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06.txt

<niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn> Tue, 18 December 2018 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF59C1310C4 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 04:53:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKCWnCvVLevg for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 04:52:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F6D131104 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 04:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id AFD1472E346E11EA5868; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:52:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mse01.zte.com.cn id wBICqnPt076417; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:52:49 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn)
Message-Id: <201812181252.wBICqnPt076417@mse01.zte.com.cn>
Received: from kjyxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.30.12.204]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with SMTP id wBI9qarU072691; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:52:36 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (kjyxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid17; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:52:38 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:52:38 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b045c18c3668e3fd822
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
In-Reply-To: <ef29c1eb-2d91-4c2f-db53-34cbcb4f3cd9@pi.nu>
References: 201811081711545453208@zte.com.cn, ef29c1eb-2d91-4c2f-db53-34cbcb4f3cd9@pi.nu
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn>
To: <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: <ccamp@ietf.org>, <ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn wBICqnPt076417
X-MSS: AUDITRELEASE@mse01.zte.com.cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/MzxE1GnToiY_-Abu6XtXgTwhbzc>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_New_Version_Notification_fordraft-izh-c?= =?utf-8?q?camp-flexe-fwk-06=2Etxt?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:53:01 -0000

hi, Loa


Sorry for the late reply. As to the question, we don’t think it means that the FlexE clients have the same BW as the FlexE group.


The reason for that can be found in the slides presented during the Bangkok meeting, which can be found: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-ccamp-10-a-yang-data-model-for-flex-ethernetflexe-02


 


Once a FlexE group is created, it can be seen as one huge PCS module created as well. Transport of different FlexE client information streams over the FlexE group is decided by the data plane "control" module. As there is no slot switching, end-to-end transfer of the slot allocation in the FlexE overhead is feasible. The "control" module in FlexE mux is able to control the multiplexing of the client information streams, and that in FlexE demux is able to control the de-multiplexing of different client information streams. As all these functions are  fulfilled by the data plane, and from the control perspective, there is no difference from traditional Ethernet. The way to use MAC is the same as usual.






BR,








牛小兵     Xiaobing NIU


4/F, Sinotrans Tower A, Building 8, No.5 Anding Road, Chaoyang District,Beijing, P.R.China,



E: niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn


www.zte.com.cn





原始邮件



发件人:LoaAndersson <loa@pi.nu>
收件人:牛小兵10019881;
抄送人:ccamp@ietf.org <ccamp@ietf.org>;ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org <ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>rg>;
日 期 :2018年12月14日 13:02
主 题 :Re: 答复:  [CCAMP] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06.txt


Xiaobing NIU,

Sorry I accidentally dropped your your mail, and I was notified by a
colleague.

Inline please

On 2018-11-08 17:11, niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn wrote:
> hi,
> 
> Thanks for your work. I think it would be valuable to discuss about this 
> topic with taking into account the FlexE slides presented by my 
> colleague Qilei Wang,during the CCAMP session yesterday. The 
> presentation can be found at:<D:/Program Files 
> (x86)/zMail/app/zMail/WebContent/pcWeb/Scripts/MailControls/ReadPanelIframe/javascript:void(0);>https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-ccamp-10-a-yang-data-model-for-flex-ethernetflexe-02 
> <D:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/zMail/app/zMail/WebContent/pcWeb/Scripts/MailControls/ReadPanelIframe/javascript:void(0);> .
> 
> In the presentation, we just propose that external control tools should 
> be involved only to configure FlexE group, and no need to intervene the 
> allocation of slot resource for FlexE clients. This is different from 
> that described in draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06. As from control point of 
> view, we think once one FlexE group is up, FlexE has no difference from 
> traditional Ethernet. Detail analysis can be found in the slides.

Just to clarify, does "no difference from traditional Ethernet" mean
that the FlexE Clients have the same BW as the FlexE group??

/Loa

> Kindly request the WG to review and comment on these slides.
> 
> In addition,  we received some comments that the analysis contained in 
> the presentation is not covered in the FlexE YANG model draft.. It would 
> be better to submit a new draft about the FlexE configuration solution 
> in order to let the WG know what we want to do. I think it's reasonable 
> and we will update it. But the purpose of this new draft is not to 
> replace any existing documents, it's just used for discussion.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Xiaobing NIU
> 
> Sinotrans Tower A, Building 8, No.5 Anding Road, Chaoyang 
> District,Beijing, P.R.China,
> 
> niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn <mailto:niu.xiaobing@zte.com.cn>
> 
> www.zte.com.cn <http://www.zte.com.cn/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *发件人:*LoaAndersson <loa@pi.nu>
> *收件人:*ccamp@ietf.org <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>;
> *抄送人:*ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org 
> <ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>;draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk@ietf.org 
> <draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk@ietf.org>rg>;
> *日 期 :*2018年11月08日 11:23
> *主 题 :**[CCAMP] Fwd: New Version Notification 
> fordraft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06.txt*
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> In the short discussion yesterday (2018-11-07) I was asked to revive the
> the FlexE framework (draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk). I have done so, version
> -06 is not different from version -05 other than administrative (date
> and version).
> 
> However I think it is now time to start working on this document again,
> and it would be good to have reviews and comments.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06.txt
> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:16:02 -0800
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: Haomian Zheng <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>om>, Qilei Wang
> <wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>cn>, Iftekhar Hussain <ihussain@infinera.com>om>, Radha
> Valiveti <rvaliveti@infinera.com>om>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>nu>, Mach Chen
> <mach.chen@huawei.com>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Loa Andersson and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:        draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk
> Revision:    06
> Title:        GMPLS Routing and Signaling Framework for Flexible Ethernet (FlexE)
> Document date:    2018-11-07
> Group:        Individual Submission
> Pages:        23
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk-06
> 
> Abstract:
>      This document specifies GMPLS control plane requirements, framework,
>      and architecture for FlexE technology.
> 
>      As different from earlier Ethernet data planes FlexE allows for
>      decoupling of the Ethernet Physical layer (PHY) and Media Access
>      Control layer (MAC) rates.
> 
>      Study Group 15 (SG15) of the ITU-T has endorsed the FlexE
>      Implementation Agreement from Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF) and
>      included it, by reference, in some of their Recommendations.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64