[CCAMP] [Errata Verified] RFC7139 (3946)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 11 April 2014 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5321A0165; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAh8rY3dg9n4; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBBF1A0460; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A254518000C; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com, zhangfatai@huawei.com, zhangguoying@mail.ritt.com.cn, sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.it, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, kpithewan@infinera.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140411094812.A254518000C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 02:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/O8oQ_Q7hmF335bVF9XxrwtO2K9E
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [CCAMP] [Errata Verified] RFC7139 (3946)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:48:24 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7139,
"GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7139&eid=3946

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Fred Gruman <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>
Date Reported: 2014-04-02
Verified by: Adrian Farrel (IESG)

Section: 7

Original Text
-------------
After decreasing the bandwidth, the ingress node
SHOULD send a ResvErr message to tear down the old control state.

Corrected Text
--------------
After decreasing the bandwidth, the ingress node
SHOULD send a PathTear message to tear down the old control state.

Notes
-----
PathTear is the usual mechanism to teardown old control state. This is would also make the bandwidth decreasing procedure consistent with the bandwidth increasing procedure (bandwidth increasing procedure uses PathTear to teardown old control state.)

This change looks like a change of substance, but the authors confirm that their intent was to use the same process for both the increase and decrease in bandwidth.

--------------------------------------
RFC7139 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks
Publication Date    : March 2014
Author(s)           : F. Zhang, Ed., G. Zhang, S. Belotti, D. Ceccarelli, K. Pithewan
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG