Re: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02

Igor Bryskin <IBryskin@advaoptical.com> Thu, 08 August 2013 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <IBryskin@advaoptical.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEED21F9A78 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fdA+FOqfo8-N for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.advaoptical.com (mail3.advaoptical.com [74.202.24.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E49821F9D3B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl-srv-mail10.atl.advaoptical.com (atl-srv-mail10.atl.advaoptical.com [172.16.5.39]) by atl-vs-fsmail.advaoptical.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r78La8jv004707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:36:08 -0400
Received: from ATL-SRV-MAIL10.atl.advaoptical.com ([fe80::c4d6:b136:bc16:77ae]) by atl-srv-mail10.atl.advaoptical.com ([fe80::c4d6:b136:bc16:77ae%17]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:36:08 -0400
From: Igor Bryskin <IBryskin@advaoptical.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02
Thread-Index: Ac6UeCOcyiZvNP7VTj6v1XoohGG+nwABwvPQ
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:36:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CDAC6F6F5401B245A2C68D0CF8AFDF0A192956B8@atl-srv-mail10.atl.advaoptical.com>
References: <fef00ba6c7f24978ad08fb60ee929a79@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <fef00ba6c7f24978ad08fb60ee929a79@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.21.1.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-08-08_06:2013-08-08, 2013-08-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:36:28 -0000

John,
I agree completely with you.

Cheers,
Igor

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 5:15 PM
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-02

Hi,

I think there is a basic issue with this draft, which is that the server network manages its own TE metrics and those metrics almost certainly have nothing in common with the TE metrics used in a given client network.

Given this, would it not be better to have policy in the client nodes that maps the characteristics of a given LSP established across the server network into the TE metric to be advertised with that LSP in the client network?

Yours Irrespectively,

John


_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp