Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt

"Masanori Miyazawa" <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp> Thu, 19 April 2012 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F9511E80C7 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.722, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGHdq0q3FHDX for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6547E11E80BB for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B3417481CF; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:04:06 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-3ocQVEAIvl; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:04:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.cn.kddilabs.jp (yellow.lan.kddilabs.jp [172.19.98.10]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7B917481C0; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:04:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from miyazawaVAIO (unknown [172.19.64.90]) by mail.cn.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFF01E0002; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:04:04 +0900 (JST)
From: Masanori Miyazawa <ma-miyazawa@kddilabs.jp>
To: 'Acee Lindem' <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <20120414002417.13249.58136.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0AFCAE2C-9E4F-4E81-82A2-B13E9C27E843@ericsson.com> <4F8D1258.5000501@cttc.es> <007c01cd1c78$ba379330$2ea6b990$@kddilabs.jp> <1E4CFF92-AE96-4FCE-9F39-A9B5A237A16A@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <1E4CFF92-AE96-4FCE-9F39-A9B5A237A16A@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:03:59 +0900
Message-ID: <007301cd1e78$539c3f70$fad4be50$@kddilabs.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQH1PIOwJEKglEOjaylgGNVvGYf79QIoFEG0AhQfmDUBzlPyZwE6sZ+AlhhLkOA=
Content-Language: ja
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:04:15 -0000

Acee,

Thank you. I will update the document. 

If there are any comments, please let me know.

Regards,
Masanori

-----Original Message-----
From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.lindem@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 12:11 AM
To: Masanori Miyazawa
Cc: Ramon Casellas; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt

Hi Masanori,
I agree that it should be bytes per second consistent with RFC 3630 and RFC
5307. 
Thanks,
Acee
On Apr 17, 2012, at 5:01 AM, Masanori Miyazawa wrote:

> Hi, Ramon
> 
> Thank you for your comment on this document.
> As you mentioned, OSPF and ISIS (RFC 3630 and 5307) define byte per 
> second (not bit).
> 
> If there is no problem, we will modify the definition of UNIT from bit per
> second to byte per second.	 
> Any other comments about it?
> 
> Regards,
> Masanori
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
> Of Ramon Casellas
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:49 PM
> To: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-12.txt
> 
> El 14/04/2012 21:08, Acee Lindem escribió:
>> As we discussed offline, this version addresses all my comments.
>> Acee
> Acee, authors, all,
> 
> Just a minor comment, shouldn't bandwidth values be in bytes per second 
> (units) or I missed something ? (UNITS        "Bit per seconds" )
> 
> Thanks,
> R.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp