[CCAMP] Next steps on overlay
"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Thu, 24 January 2013 20:04 UTC
Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F62D11E80A2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:04:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-J9w5WU3xFx for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A2911E809B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.128.153] (EHLO flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.15.0-1) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id bb391015.0.1923317.00-375.5370636.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <db3546@att.com>); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:04:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 510193bc3517b382-0d4514c90c6d7a2a806c950e6f9f909f680876cc
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0OK4BBR018183 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:04:11 -0800
Received: from fflint03.pst.cso.att.com (fflint03.pst.cso.att.com [150.234.39.63]) by flpi408.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0OK42Jf017864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:04:05 -0800
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUB9E.ITServices.sbc.com (misout7msghub9e.itservices.sbc.com [144.151.223.61]) by fflint03.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:03:46 -0800
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.75]) by MISOUT7MSGHUB9E.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.61]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:03:45 -0500
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Next steps on overlay
Thread-Index: Ac36bemQNHMdz+KeTBOfZZLP6sIh3g==
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:03:44 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8258164@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.214]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8258164MISOUT7MSGUSR9OIT_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <db3546@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.128.153]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=PtskmXw3 c=1 sm=0 a=xwOvzTHDVLE4u4nGvK72ag==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=RWEAq7CW3jcA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP]
X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=0P-fCPFO7h4A:10 a=2hAAqV_Ix]
X-AnalysisOut: [He8B6NFahwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=aQOE6LbfdNX71LlqzVEA:9 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=KvjZj2Bhhaga2eQJ:21]
Subject: [CCAMP] Next steps on overlay
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:04:13 -0000
CCAMP, There's been quite a bit of discussion on the list, we'd like to see progress on this topic. Perhaps we've reached the point where it's time to update/author drafts to reflect current positions. This can either be done in one document or in multiple (authors' choice). We also note that multiple viewpoints on how overlays may be deployed/operated have been discussed. We suggest that documenting these use cases, including data plane and control plane relationships/boundaries, would be helpful. Thanks, Deborah and Lou CCAMP Chairs
- [CCAMP] Next steps on overlay BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [CCAMP] Next steps on overlay Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Next steps on overlay Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Next steps on overlay Lou Berger