Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers

"Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0A81A00EA for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:34:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdBPPImLZcjZ for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0457F1A00DF for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:34:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1448; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391438051; x=1392647651; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=r/MQVxU+OQBZ7yEBPQ43LNxrA+CuYBlOHCNVClKlXhk=; b=DdGjuaLIn4rXRc/0hMUo39Ao/2cQe8O2adgZ23DXfVVZUBZC/nMGcIOk DDPgD9r7wGBpI0tMD3xrRGV214ic2a7P4W1KqmMZqXsap+Dvr251Lvjj3 dTel///NyAQQLR7Xet4hrseceIKBwyZ0AEO6S9XQUz660XQP4NzuSRzTS w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsFAOGn71KtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgww4V74IgQgWdIInAQQBAQFGJQsOBAEIYQwLJQIEAQ0FiAUNzEwXBI8FB4Q4BIkRjxmSIYFvgT6CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,772,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="301488190"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2014 14:34:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s13EY9P4002767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:34:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.71]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 08:34:09 -0600
From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
To: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>, Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Oscar González de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>, "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
Thread-Index: AQHPHo1BUqnGK5MZTkidP1a0HuaLvJqfWVOAgAAFhICAAAU/AIAAAKAAgAQPSgD//8wDgIAAaU0A///y3YCAAFRJgIAAIcYA
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:34:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CF1566E1.57229%ggalimbe@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52EF9A9B.6040002@cttc.es>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812
x-originating-ip: [144.254.172.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <C9BE52C402D7F54C8536BA5CCF5BE15B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:34:12 -0000

I agree Ramon, 

I didn't see any constraints WRT m values.
In any case, if there are constraints, the idea is to submit a proposal to
ITU-T to extend m coding to 16 bits.

Best Regards, 

Gabriele



Gabriele Galimberti
Technical Leader
Cisco Photonics Srl


Via Philips, 12
20900 - Monza (MI)
Italy
www.cisco.com/global/IT/ <http://www.cisco.com/global/IT/>

ggalimbe@cisco.com
Phone :+39 039 2091462
Mobile :+39 335 7481947
Fax :+39 039 2092049
















On 2/3/14 2:33 PM, "Ramon Casellas" <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> wrote:

>El 03/02/2014 14:29, Zafar Ali (zali) escribió:
>> Hi-
>>
>> I am happy if we don't need to do so. But is this not better than
>> defining/ extending a new label format when ITU-T changes the data
>>plane?
>
>Dear all,
>
>I may be missing something (apologies in advance if it is the case) and
>since I don't have them here right now, for the sake of this discussion,
>maybe could anyone point to the relevant part of the document(s) e.g.
>G.694.1 / G.872 etc. where it is said that the value of m is bound to 256?
>We are aware of the concept of frequency slot, nominal central
>frequencies (n, and their values) and the concept of frequency slot
>width, but I cannot recall now such a bound.
>
>Thanks
>R.
>
>_______________________________________________
>CCAMP mailing list
>CCAMP@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp