Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03

["Zafar Ali (zali)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lou- 

Yes, the IPR is still being documented. 

Thanks

Regards...Zafar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 10:25 AM
> To: Zafar Ali (zali); George Swallow (swallow); Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil); Matt Hartley (mhartley);
> Kenji Kumaki; Rudiger Kunze; CCAMP
> Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
> 
> Zafar,
> 
> Just a question for clarification, does "a work in progress" mean that the disclosure is in process,
> that the IPR is still being documented, or something completely different ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  Lou
> 
> 
> 
> On December 15, 2012 10:09:07 AM "Zafar Ali (zali)" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Hi Lou, et al-
> >
> > Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
> > No, the IPR has not been disclosed but it's a work in progress.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards...Zafar
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:01 PM
> > > To: Zafar Ali (zali); George Swallow (swallow); Clarence Filsfils
> > (cfilsfil); Matt Hartley (mhartley);
> > > Kenji Kumaki; Rudiger Kunze; CCAMP
> > > Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
> > >
> > > Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
> > >
> > > As part of the preparation for the poll on making this document a WG
> > > document:
> > >
> > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> > draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03?
> > >
> > >   Please state either:
> > >
> > >   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > >   or
> > >   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> > >
> > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > (see RFCs 3979, 4879,
> > > 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> > >
> > >    If yes to the above, please state either:
> > >
> > >   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > >   or
> > >   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> > >
> > >   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> > >   appropriate.
> > >
> > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> > the above by responding to
> > > this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> > > relevant
> > IPR.  This document will not
> > > advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
> > each author and listed
> > > contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> > > MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> > >
> > > If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an
> > > author
> > or contributor, we remind
> > > you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages
> > > you
> > to notify the IETF if you
> > > are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain
> > from participating in any
> > > contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For
> > > more
> > information, please see the
> > > RFCs listed above and
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > CCAMP WG Chairs
> > >
> > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
> >
> >
>