[CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-18: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-18: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document. The topic is very specific and
contains mainly a long YANG module, i.e., my review has focused on the non-YANG
parts as I am trusting the OPS AD and YANG doctors for the YANG part.

Talking about YANG, I am afraid that this I-D exhibits an issue of doing
'delta' model by augmenting an existing one: the tree view is too long and is
mostly useless. Nothing that can be addressed in this I-D of course.

Comments:

In section 1, is "server-layer network" actually the usual "underlay"? If so,
why not using the more common IETF terminology. Else, it is worth defining it.

Also, s/captures topology related information/captures topology-related
information/ ?

`Optical Transport Networks (OTN)` the OTN acronym is expanded twice in this
section ;-)