[CCAMP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The shepherd write-up says that there have been normative references to
non-IETF docs which seem to have been removed now. I wondering is that is
correct. I'm by far not an expert and didn't have time to review this doc in
detail but I would think that you would need to know some details of these
on-IETF specs in-order to fully understand and correctly implement this YANG
model, no?