RE: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D

Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com> Tue, 05 August 2008 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2563C3A69C4 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Voj2339fhfsS for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15F63A683D for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KQRJi-000Fd5-TR for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:31:30 +0000
Received: from [206.16.17.180] (helo=usaga04-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ylee@huawei.com>) id 1KQRJc-000Fc3-DP for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:31:27 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.9.16]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K55000Q44SB8H@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:31:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from L73682 ([10.124.12.74]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K5500G5T4S7OP@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:31:23 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:31:13 -0500
From: Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D
In-reply-to: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <001201c8f729$713c34b0$4a0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Thread-index: Acj3GKDaCQlkF3tuQJ6CuHJEqe89awAELqog
References: <014101c8f718$51e07740$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>

In favor of the draft to be WG draft. 

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:24 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Poll for RWA Info model as WG I-D

Hi,

draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-info-03.txt was discussed in Dublin and seemed to

be pretty mature.

Note that despite the file name, the content of this document is consistent 
with its title: "Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for 
Wavelength Switched Optical Networks." That is, the scope is limited to the 
information model for RWA.

Can we have your opinion, please, on whether this document is ready to be 
adopted as a working group I-D.

Thanks,
Adrian and Deborah