Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F337A1A1A91 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTxlLxTkX2Uw for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103381A0104 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 447894F6DFBC; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:43:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (slsv7at.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.245.107]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9UIhEJg011320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:43:15 +0100
Received: from [135.244.176.8] (beller.lra.lucent.com [135.244.176.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9UIhC0I012075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:43:13 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <545286BF.3020307@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:43:11 +0100
From: Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/UOH7OU340ecoM72sfPCVFCu2Rg8
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:43:24 -0000

Hi Lou, all,

On 29.10.2014 20:38, Lou Berger wrote:
All,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group
document.  The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting.

This is a bit of an atypical adoption call.  We, the chairs, think this
document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes
should be directed by the WG.  Recall that the individual authors have
already merged this document with
draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp.  Our questions to the WG are:

1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document
   explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE
   RFCs/mechanisms?

   Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish.
yes, for circuit switching technologies I see a need for such a document.

2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how?

   Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or
   something else.
reviewer

3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document
   as the basis for the topic?

   Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support".
yes/support


Thanks,
Dieter


   If indicating no, please state your objections to the document,
   keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it
   works its way through wg process.  Either way, also please feel
   free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption.

   Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1.

The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp