Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP?
stefan vallin <stefan@wallan.se> Wed, 10 May 2017 18:05 UTC
Return-Path: <stefan@wallan.se>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE9A12E049 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 11:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wallan-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oeBFW6Wak11t for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 11:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC94129473 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m123so8424822wma.0 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wallan-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=FGGej05oAvFL1sOlXDIGG2B1PW1OXJmXCL2ajLnJ3HI=; b=SNyOXAxQhyYVmfiG/ejeCbktiiJtoZKy1+f81rOFON6I4GT4LG15gyhKiDm/R8Fo6/ /e44fJA4PTQXARrkYtq8bUCkG/RZxkl2VqOjLR+UW6DciIm7X8qnNLZreQdP6YvLF27Y stKkZEMOzeE+Yglo0ASTNafd/hdW1LkodoCrwmtNt35iVDhmYUWA9cA2JgfUi/Jvl/Ox RhWLOFo9chih4eHxIWk6qC3l21RV8PDycf/o6ngDQXXQnF7F8fKZj+Ro0zZDXIBU8UIL PjJWjM/KZxa2cmcQ+Wb9rwasOeYeXVbdGm6b4R610JKFlhEQSPzsC94DpPM94Aw/5eg4 5Adg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=FGGej05oAvFL1sOlXDIGG2B1PW1OXJmXCL2ajLnJ3HI=; b=lVgOMRIRl7WhNYd/fz9zUuGvDewBNgECGiYAGZlmHQOtetjyNBD2pDM61ihY7zdaLQ iCFESCLlksRGh0vzE8fJUqgokfmTLe0F2XgJlUgb75TTOZMlPYFFvZqMZdhOUG3ePpaz 7s7jRnXAFYve1myH7LXnWbtkNsiVB9uaffV8XMb2sOamWlY5IKcVo243RMJcPQ9RRVyE pft5XA4DsXi2SR6hbUw66wTfEHNZuX2HZfu1mR2qdkCdSMgR16nRoNklwE1emC6wKKIR GE0bQrp5VLK+amDkbwgYrFPM/w7xd3gaUAJfLXtcF8rV3b6wWzEMx3loftOq0sSAXBml nVgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDLI5OFltvLxQatSizdsgb78nmPu6U1XYV94XeIjGOf2hcvUA/1 BIpDldEABC1vzA==
X-Received: by 10.28.109.81 with SMTP id i78mr1940303wmc.24.1494439509280; Wed, 10 May 2017 11:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.241] (b2b-94-79-174-146.unitymedia.biz. [94.79.174.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n49sm4495110wrn.30.2017.05.10.11.05.08 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 May 2017 11:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_63EE04D6-4E17-4013-93C3-5DFA2470B16B"
From: stefan vallin <stefan@wallan.se>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <02c201d2c96f$9ae1ae40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 20:05:06 +0200
Cc: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Message-Id: <B986C7FF-82CF-4D8F-B18A-C492FF122287@wallan.se>
References: <20170508.100942.1723888645272889243.mbj@tail-f.com> <AM2PR07MB09946D8FC13130E568BDEB95F0EE0@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR07MB1005AD5334CFBE2C0009B420F0EF0@VI1PR07MB1005.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8AB50E23E@DGGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com> <55A58B0B-281F-40CD-81E9-0F074CA61E95@wallan.se> <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A43A260B36@DGGEML503-MBS.china.huawei.com> <9F12ECC1-2748-47AD-81D8-C835AAC4BFB9@wallan.se> <02c201d2c96f$9ae1ae40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/UX3lDqlqt_ll1XHYn2cqGcQ8TlY>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP?
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 18:05:13 -0000
Hi! > > not IETF but ITU-T. i think that would be a mistake by IETF… We have to admit, alarms is a fundamental piece of any device or controller. IETF has a good history of defining *working and interoperable* standards. Why should IETF skip alarms? And, note well, the ietf-alarms module is not even close to the X.733 piece from a design perspective. I am just referring to the principle of a generic alarm module. /s Stefan Vallin stefan@wallan.se +46705233262
- [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] 答复: YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? t.petch
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? stefan vallin
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? Yemin (Amy)
- [CCAMP] 答复: YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? Zhenghaomian
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? stefan vallin
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? t.petch
- Re: [CCAMP] YANG Alarm Module in CCAMP? stefan vallin