[CCAMP]Re: IPR polling - draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

[Ricard Vilalta <[e-mail]>]

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

BR,

R.

 

 

-- 

Ricard Vilalta

Research Director

[e-mail]

 

Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC)

Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 7 - Building B4

08860 - Castelldefels

Tel.: [phone]

 

DATA PROTECTION INFORMATION. Data controller: CENTRE TECNOLOGIC DE
TELECOMUNICACIONS DE CATALUNYA (G62616586):

 

We inform you that your identification data and the data contained in the
emails and attached files can be incorporated into our databases, in order
to maintain professional and / or commercial relationships, and that it will
be preserved throughout the relationship. According to the current
regulations, you can exercise your right to access, rectification, erasure,
restriction of processing, to portability and to object by sending an email
to [e-mail].

This message and any attached document, where appropriate, may be
confidential and intended for the original recipient only.

 

Before printing this e-mail or attachments, be sure it is necessary. It is
in our hands to protect the environment.

 

De: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <[e-mail]> 
Enviat: miércoles, 11 de septiembre de 2024 18:42
Per a: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; LE ROUZIC Esther TGI/OLN
<[e-mail]>
A/c: [e-mail]
Tema: IPR polling - draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

 

Authors, Contributors, CCAMP,

 

We anticipated that we would handle RFC9093bis and optical impairment
topology as a cluster, and we will, but this doesn’t prevent us from
managing IPR polling and WG last call separately (more efficient). Hence
we’ll start with the IPR polling for RFC9093 bis.

 

This is the IPR polling in preparation for the WG last call of
draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11.

 

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

 

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

 

or

 

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

 

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules

(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

 

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"

 

or

 

"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

 

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not
you are aware of any relevant IPR.

 

NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

 

Thanks

Daniele