[CCAMP]Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Gabriele Galimberti <ggalimbe56@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2024 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ggalimbe56@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D39C1519AC for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hnnCLCUbOpvw for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2985C15106F for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c97c7852e8so7905716a12.1 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730212799; x=1730817599; darn=ietf.org; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kKqACkPaRa9HJuBEXnw9lkuhF0W2/3KbciWbq4FlBTI=; b=Y/1qoo5IwUMQTaC4ome8W8d6nGKjabQ+0pqS4pFup+p7MYBpn4voBnFjPnvOzz9xqF zzL3nUvbfR+gPDSHA4JRR2dq/ip1363IQAG4nC5uUbj5JwZhKKTgMTwLtp6swFyNhnqE imJpeFyARqUP6AOujgztFmYfzgFFo9UjF0Nj2WEj+0T/ijy5m8xHPWb0bvFKlI+IfY8c /Ai4qCbTQiNRZxMnz9FAD9Fa/3z2QyeVDPYBVHli4gZbuESzFnHYT8scobE9ZIjAJdWU qW3MDaFVOkufPGlYp6bdMz8wI+7zkS51eI7ENIbEedPWynAZzMEjONRQDuJTi3bHBn06 24cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730212799; x=1730817599; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kKqACkPaRa9HJuBEXnw9lkuhF0W2/3KbciWbq4FlBTI=; b=JUcrxxtc1oi/BrT7h0jlQ4R6hVBV02TOlHFt0A7biM2T8oS+a8WMKN5LwnPi72U+Lj Bso+gAy6jP6g0uANIlt71rWewvYOYX1cG06ZNVJbWXz54i1rmyWfffmzPm6FfKFmhpIH 2LR0xNenGHgEdzuqfcifns5hXXhtisXMrRJjz//Iy1bnIlvDm51dNGEXSBeIy5kHwier gyIGnH+ZO8jwNG8cK95loDXu3Pt9UGjcUiZpviUyFEulxIxc2U+RunusSgyflzneV/yZ YW8zAb4eDTdV5AVX1Mf97R+v3TMQ0rBIO2rzYAkXpBSRJFUTAfCmaC57tTmNVgd9jAH3 SH2w==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXA/FPn8gJ8QaVrMJ3LqHf/WDK8fHnFdm38WVGH3kD03DGhnbjZ/4Y260VSNbmNDy2kugEqmA==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwYMU8jWXoMc2iJZCqog85AO2ncdwNlggeS7vMM9FLcGgykP+xl EfwGY2TX+jzxg8jci08cV4bw96JUIQsbaitSd12yGtGImQU4Ho6408hICw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF7JEKRN96vVijzcv+1rHGBvPwRDPVvLZzwghZu3UvdhAnEXlyYynnE6PXqF8IkvOMYuf46lw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d92:b0:a99:ebbb:1307 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9de6195af9mr1147533866b.59.1730212798311; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AS8P192MB1398.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([2603:1026:c03:6482::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a9b1f297204sm477196266b.116.2024.10.29.07.39.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gabriele Galimberti <ggalimbe56@gmail.com>
To: "Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)" <dceccare=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP]WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
Thread-Index: AdskZn955L6z5CpFSD6k2OItYblH6w==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:39:41 +0000
Message-ID: <AS8P192MB13989199237713FA0B1720A6FA4B2@AS8P192MB1398.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <CY8PR11MB7340F9832E1B69281102A5E2D44C2@CY8PR11MB7340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AS8P192MB13989199237713FA0B1720A6FA4B2AS8P192MB1398EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: E6KMNHFBKKD53H2UWW7HQGVHN5AALDII
X-Message-ID-Hash: E6KMNHFBKKD53H2UWW7HQGVHN5AALDII
X-MailFrom: ggalimbe56@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ccamp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [CCAMP]Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/WFMlXrE12haNeAmSY_m5BgwtW-E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ccamp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ccamp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ccamp-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Daniele and chairs,

I support the draft : it covers all the common YANG entities and can be used by any of the L0 YANG model we have in CCAMP and TEAS.

Best Regards,

Gabriele Galimberti

Via Melgacciata, 13
20813 – Bovisio Masciago (MB)
Italy

+39 3357481947

Da: "Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)" <dceccare=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Data: martedì 22 ottobre 2024 alle ore 15:00
A: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Oggetto: [CCAMP]WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

Hi CCAMP,

-- IMPORTANT PREAMBLE--
We have two drafts which have a very good level of maturity, namely RFC9093bis and Optical Impairment aware topology.
The more we work on them and the more disparate use cases pop up. We requested the authors to have the drafts in a status that is “good enough” to address the vast majority of use cases supported by the industry today so that we can progresse the drafts to the next stage and not hold them potentially for ever.

With the actual version of the drafts we should be able to cover all of the use cases with only the following limitations:


  *   Homogenous muxponders: with the present version of the draft we are not able to support use cases of interoperability between muxponder of different versions, and we can use regenerator always at the lowest level (OTU) since we do not have client information when setting up a tunnel. This information is missing today.
  *   Client mapping compatibility: at the moment we can support optical compatibility with operational model, but we don’t support client compatibility.

These use cases and others that might come to your mind, if really needed, can be handled by an update to the RFCs at later stages.
- END PREAMBLE --

That said, this starts a 3 weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11.

The last call will last 3 weeks to provide more time for reviewing, given we’re approaching IETF 121 meeting. It will end on Tuesday November 12th . Please indicate your support or concern to the mailing list. Review comments and nits are also welcome.
All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been collected and can be found in the CCAMP WIKI page: https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/ccamp

If anyone is willing to be the shepherd for this draft, please feel free to volunteer (authors excluded).

Thanks
Daniele, Fatai, Luis