IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] [mpls] Questions on draft-vkst-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-01

Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 January 2012 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292D25E8003; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:12:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.068
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtG4jSKtguOn; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:12:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983FF5E8002; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:12:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so10059624iab.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:12:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=x2VV0Fm7COQUBFfFFKQyq7JbH7z+FEYyXRLuGT99FgQ=; b=XQpe1m7uV1SgEknmuan0k5ihuTgdUtdthveXZoLIgbgL92rWfS8AT3/nLV5ufX/nJn lrxiUHgmuB2xLADRGNx7tsoVkNWvEdom4NkvAWVhMxKRlAg5uGNFXTTr6Z7jr0qFHJql Or4m39jW9bW+eqAfIZahdJ4XFphNgVOTib8Ng=
Received: by 10.50.217.168 with SMTP id oz8mr63448842igc.24.1325614349176; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:12:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.253.142] ([12.207.18.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id py9sm90631421igc.2.2012.01.03.10.12.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:12:28 -0800 (PST)
References: <CABU764s08xA-sVn8oBw56_w+uWZ0JTggWpp0oXmv+edZ__eofg@mail.gmail.com> <4F0342A9.1000301@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F0342A9.1000301@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <C775B151-3DC8-42FF-8A69-A15C1FC10988@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A405)
From: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:12:28 -0800
To: "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:14:56 -0800
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, Jaihari Kalijanakiraman <jaiharik@ipinfusion.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [mpls] Questions on draft-vkst-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-01
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:12:30 -0000

[speaking as a co-author of the MIB]

I echo what Stewart has said.
In addition, unless IETF standardizes a specific technology, in this case, Y.1731 based MPLS TP OAM, it is not prudent to add MIB objects supporting that specific technology. If at all the need arises and the requirement needs to be fulfilled, will surely address that. At this point we do not see the need.

Cheers
Sam

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
>> 2. Will this MIB be enhanced also to configure "*Y.1731 based OAM for MPLS-TP*"?
>> 
> Without prejudice to any decisions on Y.1731 and MPLS-TP.
> 
> Wouldn't such a MIB be a derivative of the Y.1731 MIB?
> 
> Stewart
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email