Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-06

Hi WG

I agree with Dieter's suggestion on:

-          draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang should be adopted on par with draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-06

-          putting all common grouping to layer0-types makes sense -- -all wson/flexi-grid related models and draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang have already imported groupings from layer0-types. We might need to do the same for draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-06.

In regard to having a separate draft that hosts only the layer0-types, this would makes sense if we have a stable layer0-types and move this draft first before all other drafts to avoid the hang-over case (which happened for te-topology draft).

Thanks.
Young

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 12:02 PM
To: julien.meuric@orange.com; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-06

Hi Julien, all,

I concur with you that it would be the best to also adopt draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang asap and make sure that both drafts are well aligned
and consistent.

Both drafts may share the same types/groupings (intention of ietf-layer0-types?). Probably layer0-types should be put in a separate draft like te-types (TEAS).
Other drafts on the CCAMP agenda should be based on layer0-types as well.

Let's discuss this during the CCAMP session next Mon at IETF 104 in Prague.

Thanks,
Dieter

On 19.03.2019 17:29, julien.meuric@orange.com<mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I support the adoption of the I-D. Like

draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang, it clearly fills a

hole. If both these drafts get adopted, I think bringing consistency on

good ideas from both will be straightforward.

Thanks,

Julien

On 11/03/2019 17:41, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:

Working group,

We finally managed to collect all the IPR disclosures and we're ready

to start the WG adoption poll for the dwdm-if drafts (YANG and LMP).

This starts a two weeks poll on making

*draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-06 *a CCAMP working group

document.

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not

support" and a motivation for  your reply, mandatory for the "not

support" and nice to have for the "support".

The polling will end on *Monday March 25^th * ..

Thanks,

Daniele & Fatai

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_______________________________________________

CCAMP mailing list

CCAMP@ietf.org<mailto:CCAMP@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp