[CCAMP] Fwd: Re: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Wed, 14 November 2012 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABE221F8814 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:14:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.996
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvcTP2OH43Sn for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071121F857C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so669103eek.31 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:14:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-forwarded-message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BTrMsMK69kPRyWslpHSi3PSoT0QA/cC2Ma+4OKkGbao=; b=nmW7TBrrShKoW6rOPqxzPUvTAUvOANGNH/iKnoHlkubWBie1GFcHvrXaqH6TIByC8g UvoUlxOI6Y/sb5noUjPscnnROvWvysWlBUZqGhnKTung7h4EDw/EQPXABOi6Q5TlHjRz 63t3ofpNluHrDbAEzehOWv5X9q8IbKU7AlNIFPVzDJevwyDl456JCbrkY1ZX/Nx0Zfec cmIicJMePvWrbya04Ru+wN/9zvfk7ODfYSV1cVEJ/TYNAzVMl428unBzara87SRCS+3t +IxlfTUXgzi+pbTk6M9dv1Ih+ukYs4vf38DcOTdrpDO7wbzIddWyxpG+Sde681lO+mpn FkVg==
Received: by with SMTP id g1mr91722486eem.14.1352931289408; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:14:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local (dhcp-077-250-051-060.chello.nl. []) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b44sm32216321eep.12.2012. (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50A417D7.3000808@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:14:47 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <50A368EC.3050508@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50A368EC.3050508@gmail.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <50A368EC.3050508@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?RndkOiBSZTogILTwuLQ6ILTwuLQ6ICBXRyBMYXN0IENh?= =?gb2312?b?bGwgY29tbWVudHMgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jY2FtcC1nbXBscy1nNzA5LWZy?= =?gb2312?b?YW1ld29yay0wOQ==?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:14:51 -0000

Somehow this email did not appear in the CCAMP list.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复:  WG Last Call comments on
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:48:28 +0100
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
To: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
CC: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>et>,
<draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org>rg>, CCAMP

Hello Fatai,

(only focusing  on the reference)

You wrote:

> Regarding [G709-v1] reference, there is only general reference to
> [G709-v1] and [G709-v1a1], ie., no specific text is referenced from
> some specific place of these two documents, so we reused the
> same approach used by [RFC4328], otherwise, [G709-v1] and
> [G709-v1a1] should be used together to replace the alone
> [G709-v1] (because it is really difficult to differentiate either
> [G709-v1] or [G709-v1a1] should be referenced).
> Here is the referenced used by [RFC4328]:
> [ITUT-G709] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network 
> (OTN)," G.709 Recommendation (and Amendment 1), February
> 2001 (October 2001).

Please note that the current in-force version of G.709 is from
February 2012, it includes all previous amendments, no need
to reference them separately.
Also G.709 has an additional Y.1331 number, so the reference
can be:

[ITUT-G709] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network
(OTN)," G.709/Y.1331 Recommendation, February 2012.

Regards, Huub.