Re: Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

OK.

Thanks, I will point at the I-Ds, summarise how we are splitting RWA for 
immediate attention and impairments for future work, note that we do not 
intend to define impairments (but will defer to the ITU-T on this), and 
comment that we believe that the modeling of asymmetric switches such as 
ROADMs may be an area that the ITU-T would like to work on.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Bernstein" <[e-mail]>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks


> Hi Adrian and WGs, looking at the ITU-T SG 15's Optical work plan. They 
> put an emphasis on Metro Optical Networks and point out that these can be 
> different from long haul networks in that that they may not need to use 
> regenerators and that these may be significantly more "dynamic" with 
> respect to provisioning than long haul DWDM networks. We should point them 
> at CCAMP's  WSON work which includes both the Framework document and the 
> RWA info model document.  The modeling of asymmetric switches such as 
> ROADMs seems to have been overlooked at the ITU-T.
>
> Regards
>
> Greg
>
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We received a liaison back in February 
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/425/) asking for our comments on 
>> ITU-T Study Group 15's "Optical Transport Networks & Technologies 
>> Standardization Work Plan" 
>> (http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com15/otn/index.html)
>>
>> Please let me know by Friday September 5th if you have any comments you 
>> would like us to make. If I don't receive anything, I will send a 
>> response to thank them for keeping us informed and asking them to share 
>> any future work plans with us.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> ===================================================
> Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking [phone]
>
>
>