Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-ext-04.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 14 August 2012 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A655521F8548 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.410, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OyMyT24HoVW8 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2555421F8504 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16194 invoked by uid 0); 14 Aug 2012 14:10:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2012 14:10:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=sC471fTTQfT7nE64lW6P8Q+P7xZwXQWr8ejcc1l5H5k=; b=XO1uVQ/8y4ekE5cTa7FiJULjPUE92vpKzmEZh4DpALCuJilpJ1WAguN9WEMFhEUKZ8MIwyVnuHo7TyC6plynPqP3bGNZmE/m2hN5vFeT24aWvOW0+dXZLWCVreKcBmEo;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:39043 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1T1Hp4-0005q1-EB for ccamp@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:10:18 -0600
Message-ID: <502A5C48.1080301@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:10:16 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ccamp@ietf.org
References: <20120814134519.2596.12258.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120814134519.2596.12258.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-ext-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:10:45 -0000

The authors believe that this revision addresses the comments raised by
Adrian and discussed on the list. (It also includes few other editorial
nits identified by the authors.)

Please note, as discussed, there has been one substantive technical
change (MUST --> SHOULD):

  3.2.1. Resv Message Format
OLD
  Relative ordering of ASSOCIATION objects of the same type
  MUST be preserved by transit nodes.
NEW
  Relative ordering of ASSOCIATION objects of the same type
  *SHOULD* be preserved by transit nodes.

Lou (and co-authors)

On 8/14/2012 9:45 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : RSVP Association Object Extensions
> 	Author(s)       : Lou Berger
>                           Francois Le Faucheur
>                           Ashok Narayanan
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-ext-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 16
> 	Date            : 2012-08-14
> 
> Abstract:
>    The RSVP ASSOCIATION object was defined in the context of GMPLS
>    (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching) controlled label
>    switched paths (LSPs).  In this context, the object is used to
>    associate recovery LSPs with the LSP they are protecting.  This
>    object also has broader applicability as a mechanism to associate
>    RSVP state, and this document defines how the ASSOCIATION object
>    can be more generally applied.  This document also defines
>    Extended ASSOCIATION objects which, in particular, can be used in
>    the context of the Transport Profile of Multiprotocol Label
>    Switching (MPLS-TP).  This document updates RFC 2205, RFC 3209,
>    and RFC 3473. It also modifies the definition of the Association
>    ID field defined in RFC 4872.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-ext
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-ext-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-assoc-ext-04
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>