[CCAMP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-15: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 03 May 2019 00:58 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9CA1200EA; Thu, 2 May 2019 17:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, ccamp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <155684510195.24985.8147479277009998681.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 17:58:21 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/Y99gTvSl96tgljSZcm2GUyoGhtI>
Subject: [CCAMP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 00:58:22 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for resolving my discuss point about imposing requirements on implementations that do not implement this specification. I trust Adam to get the details right of the IEEE754 binary floating-point format language, and will clear on that point as well.
- [CCAMP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker