Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 31 January 2014 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D525C1A051E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:29:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4pHZVyI6zMX for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy12-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy12-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [50.87.16.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 28D8D1A050D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 13937 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jan 2014 01:28:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy12.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2014 01:28:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=vKXKkV2ZpbwffO27Ee5Y0VuvN8djWfUqoNjYxp9bIq4=; b=SE49oSjz1Gy+Erw9A7HdC5GZXdNxWMiEeJIM7zVpAtEBGogpTXl6GE91K9FmnOh/N7sR4jOlWV9qfnwtq/4b/CjVWB9B3b+8u7LYrKFi6wcJxeRd94d3wIRbLhxUfjN1;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:60806 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1W92ud-0004hU-Ey; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:28:55 -0700
Message-ID: <52EAFC54.1000507@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:28:52 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>, Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <005901cf1d14$69d2d550$3d787ff0$@olddog.co.uk> <D7D7AB44C06A2440B716F1F1F5E70AE53FB0E5A3@SV-EXDB-PROD2.infinera.com>
In-Reply-To: <D7D7AB44C06A2440B716F1F1F5E70AE53FB0E5A3@SV-EXDB-PROD2.infinera.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label Switching Routers
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:29:04 -0000

Iftekhar,

Speaking purely from a process standpoint: adoption is the start of work
on a topic, not a codification of an end state.  This is why we
typically ask if a document reflects a "good starting point for WG
activity" when discussing the adoption of a draft.

Again, speaking from a general perspective, I certainly don't think the
process requires discussion/adoption to be blocked while a framework (or
even requirement) document has some open points.

Lou


On January 30, 2014 6:26:40 PM Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the update. In my view, there are number of areas which still 
> needs to be addressed in the framework document (e.g., control plane 
> requirements) before we move toward solution drafts.
>
> BR,
> Iftekhar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel King [mailto:daniel@olddog.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 
> 2014 9:06 AM
> To: 'CCAMP'
> Subject: [CCAMP] Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in LSC Label 
> Switching Routers
>
> Hi CCAMP'rs,
>
> The authors are planning a revision of this I-D before London, but the only 
> changes will be the addition of an Implementation Status section as per 
> RFC6982.
>
> It seems to us that this I-D is stable and that there are no further 
> technical issues. The label format documented in the I-D has been picked up 
> by the RSVP-TE extensions draft and the ongoing OSPF work.
> We would like to take this opportunity to solicit feedback from the working
> group:
>
> - Are there any changes you would like to see in the draft? - Are you happy 
> with the label format described? - What do you think the next steps should 
> be for this draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan (for the authors)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>