Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 25 January 2013 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1ED521F8946 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKwFlMCRxBuU for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17A21F891C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:58:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18375; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1359133080; x=1360342680; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Li/JMVf487BHbJ/Vzv1mJKFRpgQFdQkRyv9p2h2bRh0=; b=DZiWNz3pYjtBRE5bXG7eRGcINAVg1eRwheZ6zY/74dATh3YYYQ0tE1+L kr+5uAooKq9rlahpqUgJC9ID7I/bDMbBf0C3LgorqYpMg0DZrsoN2VUZD wQm8D26BOwkm5MtWwS531RsE3utK89UaKNNu6y+EAkXH3MKe9Ojg9TilV I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAEi4AlGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABEgki8CxZzgh4BAQEELV4BCA4DAwEBAQsdORQJCAIEARIIiAe+Wo0Eg1phA6ZVgneBbzU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,539,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="168165982"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2013 16:58:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0PGw0Op017180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:58:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.10]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:57:59 -0600
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document
Thread-Index: AQHN+rzLhH5htMp+m0CrjJ+QGe3ueZhaqE2A//+tPIA=
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:57:59 +0000
Message-ID: <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B3378B@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <650AA355E323C34D9D4AAEED952E053D3FADFB90@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.54]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B3378Bxmbrcdx14ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:58:02 -0000

Hi Rajan:

Sure, in a following revision we will add a text referencing Section 4.4.3 of RFC3209.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com<mailto:rrao@infinera.com>>
Date: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:54 AM
To: zali <zali@cisco.com<mailto:zali@cisco.com>>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>, "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

Yes/Support

Zafar,

Got it.  Will be useful if you can clarify this in the section.

Thanks
Rajan

From: Zafar Ali (zali) [mailto:zali@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:28 PM
To: Rajan Rao; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A; ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

Rajan:

RFC3209 covers this. Specifically a path change is triggered on the fly (no need to wait for refresh). I am cutting and pasting some relevant text from Section 4.4.3 of RFC3209.

"An RSVP router can decide to send Path messages before its refresh

   time if the RRO in the next Path message is different from the

   previous one.  This can happen if the contents of the RRO received

   from the previous hop router changes or if this RRO is newly added to

   (or deleted from) the Path message."

Thanks

Regards…Zafar

From: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com<mailto:rrao@infinera.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:03 PM
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>, "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

Authors,

Question:  What is the scheme for informing endpoints for the update case (sec 2.3)?   Is it refresh mechanism or something else?

Thanks
Rajan

From:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:48 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

All,

This is start a two week poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 a ccamp working group document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document.

The poll ends Thursday, Feb. 7th.

Note, as stated by some of the authors, there is IPR “still being documented”.

Thanks,
Deborah and Lou