IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Thu, 31 July 2014 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959F61A00E2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wbxkAZM5N4W for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3691A0089 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=421; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406819832; x=1408029432; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=cPbPolmg3S1HSOtBNvf+GteIBcbYQd9cETXt/qjh/cs=; b=M+K/yyyhLwt/pLcLXKY/1aZoIJE4KI82NzKO6nb/j3CY1mEQqXRm0nkT 9SJYFL4eXNvK1M6aU8ctHtvuMjODlwPwTf2GApQbJzxORIlRUUAMLKVsM QsuyCriSx9NFnxr2mPLc/nLDmTfSXoC+f1rVEdndsWjq/jaKbG3pcafQw U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMJACJd2lOtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SWAPLLIdLAYEHFneEBAEBAQIBOj8FCwIBCA4UFBAyJQEBBA4NAYgxCA2+UBePGzEHgy+BGwWwN4NJgjE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,772,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="65506337"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2014 15:17:11 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6VFHA0I026060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:17:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.65]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:17:10 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
Thread-Index: Ac+rXdFAjNn+1/4gRVGf5hQhUm4haQBfG1WAAAIKhDA=
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:17:09 +0000
Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A05659@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A00D35@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <53DA24A5.4070003@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <53DA24A5.4070003@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.190]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ZbL89KZ56tGfVppSdZKsYkPCmEc
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:17:12 -0000

Lou,

> Looking at
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/gmpls-sig-parameters/gmpls-sig-
> parameters.xhtml
> you'll see various policies have been used/suggested, including the
> combination I mention.  Perhaps we, as a WG, should agree, on default
> policy for the GMPLS registry...

I think that might be a good idea. It would be useful to have some solid guidelines for this sort of thing.

Cheers

Matt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email