Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 17 March 2014 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BF11A055D for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVfx-DtdILlq for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E571A05C3 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y10so5093492wgg.25 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yPSRgrp5fmesAvLQ5NMbKv9Umhh2FRSyQ019WQlBLyM=; b=jZGknY5PgajyihniXlHZ48uAfm+LVW+tkwL/yB6wEDSoY2890jSDOs31aB/dtsGCsO NlVRWdSZdxZ6fBnQxMuhJI6kWQW1I+zmOHuBfPutYLsz5VunOO3fYpaNUT1CCuCVgp9g mYzR+x3Pb0b8ZeT3p07VtW977V+EyOSRTl19gijJUujbuqPbVfpOvSsnQWCdNGRP3wcU AWUpCpqM0R4+jOzR7PunGK3c20E50VU2cAekiGySS/0q3LPXiDXYjcocCkpaEuNs6ypp xRqO+7fGUAGQVC6V+A7d+LQ+fG6YOcxHmdcX3hwTnE+lLEGOOc3Ig9Ayr5rMCnNlytBN Kqnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.98.165 with SMTP id ej5mr10969546wib.33.1395091134289; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.79.170 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC10861EA4@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTt-mZO4dTKc5_diQJPmttpX=wFC66X3u9U56oQso8iNMw@mail.gmail.com> <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC10861EA4@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:18:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTtJW86ydObL2bNQWATx4C34Tw36MDQFvdXSxAx-DMrkkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ZzBJUsYxXEnrwNPDaUDg4ChmjhY
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Network Assigned Upstream Label - Draft Update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:19:06 -0000

Matt, Hi!

Just noticed that I haven't responded to this.

Good question. The intended scope (of the draft) is to cover all
bidirectional LSPs that use symmetric labels. So yes, we do intend to
make some proposals in this draft (next rev, hopefully) to address the
longer labels.

Regards,
-Pavan

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Matt Hartley (mhartley)
<mhartley@cisco.com> wrote:
> Pavan, authors,
>
>
>
> Something I wanted to ask in London when you presented but didn't get the
> chance to as we were short on time...
>
>
>
> The draft as it stands talks only about 32-bit labels, but we're also
> considering longer ones (e.g. the flex-grid/super-channel work). Do you plan
> to define other wildcard labels in this draft? Or add wildcard labels to the
> drafts that define those new label formats? Or leave it for an entirely
> separate draft in future?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> Folks, Hi!
>
>
>
> We recently published a new version of the "Network Assigned Upstream Label"
> draft
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-02).
> This new-version addresses all the comments that were raised against the
> version presented in Vancouver. Please read it through and let us know if
> there are any fresh comments.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Pavan (on behalf of the authors)
>
> ps: Attached slideset (pdf) gives a quick overview of the draft