[CCAMP] draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-04

Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <kpithewan@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407E311E8214 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ADbcMTFUT0mc for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sv-casht-prod2.infinera.com (sv-casht-prod2.infinera.com [8.4.225.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC2F11E8205 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com ([fe80::dc68:4e20:6002:a8f9]) by sv-casht-prod2.infinera.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:43:48 -0700
From: Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com>
To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-04
Thread-Index: Ac6NMx+p2RAMz7T3QPeg+VDERTEEPA==
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:43:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D8D01B39D6B38C45AA37C06ECC1D65D53FDD05EC@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.100.156.118]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D8D01B39D6B38C45AA37C06ECC1D65D53FDD05ECSVEXDBPROD1infi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [CCAMP] draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-te-include-route-04
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:43:59 -0000

Authors,

For LSP sub-objects, there needs to be validations that ensures that the 2 loose abstract nodes hops (or 1 loose abstract node followed by with 1 strict hop) before and after the LSP sub-object has to exactly match with that of LSP being referenced by the sub-object, otherwise, the section of the path from the reference LSP may not be valid for the LSP being setup.

Regards
Khuzema