Re: [CCAMP] G.698.2 MIB concerns addressed by ITU-T colleagues

[Dieter Beller <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ruediger,

On 13.03.2014 15:36, [e-mail] wrote:

Hi all,

 

Huub and Dieter mentioned during the CAMP session in London that ITU-T Q6 has some concerns about additional values in document.

Huub mentioned that - I asked a follow-up question regarding the exchange of power values (see below).

 

Gabriele mentioned the reason for adding these values and we will update the documents with explaining text. During our common meeting with ITU-T at IETF  86 Pete Anslow mentioned: Transmit power may be useful, beyond that I cannot think of anything else you may want to set.

 

If you guys have still concerns lets discuss these points on the list.

The question I have is the following:

The draft defines LMP protocol messages (sub-objects) to convey the (current?) Output Power at the Ss
reference point and the Current Input Power at the Rs reference point from OXC1 to OLS1 and OXC2 to OLS2,
respectively. This is my interpretation. Now, I would like to understand for what purposes these power values
are exchanged.

My suggestion at the meeting was to add some explanatory text to the draft describing the application that
makes use of these values, i.e., that motivates the definition of these LMP extensions.


Thanks,
Dieter

 

Best regards

 

Ruediger

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
[e-mail]