Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 18 October 2012 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ADC21F8459 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.946, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r+BxKz0f2NHj for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.22.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 07B6621F8445 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7914 invoked by uid 0); 18 Oct 2012 21:29:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2012 21:29:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=ooAn98qiC1k6AbGaOckgUS+FRbwH9mswjCODuCDFsN8=; b=ggpRPmR6kfW+d7vcwzDLK+kdYM5Rrj0L9iWDdYUJaH5bDbr+g953pQLozx10R+/V6ORG6i7ebx9bfyepKG4/5fbZv2wnKg5dwVKfphclg+HZsOCohLm9zp/VNbPoVO/b;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:35396 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1TOxev-0003os-Cz; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:29:41 -0600
Message-ID: <508074BF.1090407@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:29:35 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pontus_Sk=F6ldstr=F6m?= <Pontus.Skoldstrom@acreo.se>
References: <20121007182354.19033.17145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5072FEC1.7020108@labn.net> <59AB558A089035438998A3EE6321ACBEAF72@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>, <5077174E.8000407@labn.net> <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0A886805@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se>, <507EF751.109@labn.net> <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0A88680B@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se> <508002B3.9050100@labn.net> <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0AAAF64E@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se>
In-Reply-To: <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0AAAF64E@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:30:04 -0000

Pontus,
	Thank you for addressing my comments!

Lou

On 10/18/2012 2:10 PM, Pontus Sköldström wrote:
> See inline, 
> 
> Cheers, 
> Pontus 
> --- snip --- 
>> Just noticed, the draft says:
>>    3.4.2.  MPLS OAM PM Delay sub-TLV
>>
>>    The "MPLS OAM PM Delay sub-TLV" depicted below is carried as a sub-
>>    TLV of the "OAM Functions TLV".
>>
>> Shouldn't it read:
>>    TLV of the "Performance Monitoring sub-TLV"
>>
>> and (in same section)
>>    define, suggested value 1).
>> should be
>>    define, suggested value 2).
> 
> [Pontus] 
> You're absolutely correct, fixed. 
> 
> --- snip --- 
>>> We'd rather not specify exactly what happens when the threshold is
>>> exceeded but leave that open (could be that nothing happens). And
>>> since we're not talking about any particular thing in RFC6374 there's
>>> no reference to it.
>>
>> Perhaps the way to address is to make a general statement on this
>> earlier in the section and removed both statements of:
>>
>>    Configuration of triggered action(s) is out of scope for this
>>    document but may include signaling an NMS, triggering protection
>>    switching, etc.
>>
>> Perhaps something at the start of 3.4 that says something like:
>>
>> The Performance Monitoring sub-TLV provides the configuration
>> information mentioned in Section 7 of [RFC6374]. It includes support
>> for
>> the configuration of quality thresholds and, as described in [RFC6374],
>> "the crossing of which will trigger warnings or alarms, and result
>> reporting and exception notification will be integrated into the
>> system-wide network management and reporting framework."
> 
> [Pontus] 
> Sure, that makes sense, fixed. 
> 
> 
> 
>