Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-tunnel-num-04.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 20 August 2012 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD23521F84FE for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.906, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZzWvFVIl2UN5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.55.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 52E9F21F84FC for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17416 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2012 17:38:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2012 17:38:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=uc2z6l3pofwQQyF+nPSMGwNl0O9f9OHgcLbFM4b0Wok=; b=d3QVQSZpyzSO6POa+DWL4gUDkXtH+nkxmswA2XD45PQ6qEYR78aV6+VbMWjffODHMx7tZl0DoXRH+ROWOEIEqM0cIuPjQpJTgx/g4UB5ByaZRxzGHFTE0KwJn5skyC3+;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:34656 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1T3Vvh-00078l-07; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:38:21 -0600
Message-ID: <50327601.2060502@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:38:09 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn
References: <OFBA961BDF.AE0336D2-ON48257A5D.0025E014-48257A5D.0028F24B@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OFBA961BDF.AE0336D2-ON48257A5D.0025E014-48257A5D.0028F24B@zte.com.cn>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-zhang-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-tunnel-num-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:38:45 -0000

Fei,
	To respond to your procedure point:

On 8/17/2012 3:27 AM, zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn wrote:
> I am not sure whether this draft should follow the the procedures
> defined for WG documents or not.

Individual drafts are completely under the control of the authors.  Of
course, they may choose to listen to feedback of WG participants in hope
of getting their draft accepted as a WG draft....

Lou