[CCAMP] Last Call for OTN Routing and Signaling Drafts

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Tue, 07 August 2012 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A161311E80F1 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.507, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qq-TN-Prf5Xs for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ED511E80D5 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUCGPZlmoYSqJuyfNsFHVOJZV8YWlPb34@postini.com; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:57:59 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:56:24 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "dbrungard@att.com" <dbrungard@att.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:56:22 -0700
Thread-Topic: Last Call for OTN Routing and Signaling Drafts
Thread-Index: Ac1053uvBPA59RPeSl+ZzKKFCO5j8Q==
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A5A9667A34@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] Last Call for OTN Routing and Signaling Drafts
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:58:00 -0000

Lou and Deborah,

Given that we expeditiously address the remaining small number of issues in the OTN Routing and Signaling drafts, is there any reason why we need to wait until the next IETF meeting to initiate a Last Call on them?  As has been pointed out many times, a WG's work is done on its mailing list and not in its face-to-face meetings.

Thanks,

John  

Sent from my iPhone