IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] Question about draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-09.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 28 July 2013 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D7121F9D38 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.484, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozFJMDMpzflW for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 01:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E6821F9D1E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 01:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6S8TqLM028970 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:29:52 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-45d9.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.69.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6S8Tpqb028961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:29:52 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:29:51 +0100
Message-ID: <02bd01ce8b6c$a1791940$e46b4bc0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac6LbJKTtUoIsLR6QaO8Pr1TfB/LBQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [CCAMP] Question about draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 08:30:05 -0000

Hi CCAMP,

I am currently reviewing draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-09.txt (cunningly
deceptive file name ;-)

I have a question...

The document makes reference to RFC 4202 and RFC 4203, but not to RFC 5307
(obsoleted RFC 4205). Can I ask why CCAMP no longer considers IS-IS to be a
potential routing protocol for GMPLS systems?

Thanks,

Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email