Re: New draft of the framework and requirements for Composite Transport Group

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tom.nadeau@bt.com> Wed, 29 October 2008 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E163A6B19 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.969
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8IrWRXSsSUS5 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D0C3A6B4C for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KvHx5-00056i-SW for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:47:39 +0000
Received: from [217.32.164.138] (helo=smtp3.smtp.bt.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <tom.nadeau@bt.com>) id 1KvHwm-000550-7I for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:47:33 +0000
Received: from E03MVA4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.105]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:47:15 +0000
Received: from 217.32.164.172 ([217.32.164.172]) by E03MVA4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.56]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail.bt.com ([193.113.197.26]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:47:15 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.13.0.080930
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:47:14 -0400
Subject: Re: New draft of the framework and requirements for Composite Transport Group
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tom.nadeau@bt.com>
To: "So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, "Andrew G. (Andy) Malis" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>
Message-ID: <C52E4412.EF58%tom.nadeau@bt.com>
Thread-Topic: New draft of the framework and requirements for Composite Transport Group
Thread-Index: Ack6BXCmfOqsCudJSfyuUtnJ5SiqIwAAhUZf
In-Reply-To: <84042721A487BB4C83FC772185400CB707C7498B@ASHEVS010.mcilink.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3308143634_2905413"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2008 20:47:15.0770 (UTC) FILETIME=[86CF89A0:01C93A07]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>

    Have you guys given any thought to the OAM ramifications of your
approach? I see no discussion of this in the draft.  I ask because
extensions were done to LSP ping which took  great pains to make work
correctly.  Have you thought about how to trouble-shoot this mechanism if
there are faults?

    --Tom



On 10/29/08 4:32 PM, "So, Ning" <ning.so@verizonbusiness.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> We have uploaded the draft of the framework and requirements for Composite
> Transport Group.
>  
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requireme
> nt-00.txt
>  
> Abstract
>  
>    This document states a traffic distribution problem in today's IP/
>  
>    MPLS network when multiple links are configured between two routers.
>  
>    The document presents a Composite Transport Group framework as the
>  
>    solution for the problems and specifies a set of requirements for
>  
>    Composite Transport Group(CTG).
>  
> We appreciate your input/comments and look forward to discussing in
> Minneapolis.
>  
>  
> Ning So
> Lead Engineer
> Data Traffic Engineering
> 972-729-7905
>  
>  
>