Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a WG document

Thanks Dhruv,

Noted and held for next update.

I'll let the chairs think about which track this is on.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: 30 October 2014 14:12
> To: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-
> exchange-07 a WG document
> 
> Yes/Support!
> 
> Just a few comments...
> 
> - Shouldnt the draft be on informational track?
> 
> - In section 4.3 about PCE, some text about inter-layer PCE [RFC5623]
> should also be added.
> 
> - In section 6, Building on Existing Protocols, could PCEP also play a
> role? The server PCE can provide abstract TE information to the
> abstraction layer PCE using the recent work in [1] and [2] in the
> deployments where PCEs are used. Guilty for shameless self-promotion
> :)
> 
> - update reference to farrkingel-pce-questions
> 
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
> 
> [1]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data/
> [2]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn/
> 
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This is start of a two week poll on making
> > draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-07 a CCAMP working group
> > document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or
> > “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical
> > reservations with the document.
> >
> > The poll ends Thursday October 6th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Deborah and Lou
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp