Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
"Shew, Stephen" <sshew@ciena.com> Fri, 11 January 2013 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=8723a90b54=sshew@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3209621F8918 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:20:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55DEC84A8niL for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E57B21F84BB for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:20:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0001124 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id r0BIDbwI013954; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:20:01 -0500
Received: from mdwexght02.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-29.ciena.com [63.118.36.29]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 19tqbxr3my-11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:20:00 -0500
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com (10.128.6.16) by MDWEXGHT02.ciena.com (10.4.140.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.5; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:19:51 -0500
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB02.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:19:50 -0500
From: "Shew, Stephen" <sshew@ciena.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:19:49 -0500
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
Thread-Index: Ac3ujRiTyezwDtSaRReDPXs2yDPqiQBmn0HA
Message-ID: <510C3D5C5DFBCB46AE189D936C1DD605A6F4853EBF@ONWVEXCHMB02.ciena.com>
References: <50EDA5E3.80106@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <50EDA5E3.80106@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-19548.000
x-tm-as-result: No--34.542900-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-01-11_07:2013-01-11, 2013-01-11, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1211240000 definitions=main-1301110170
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:20:06 -0000
I contacted the ITU-T editing staff (similar to the RFC editor) and they indicated that unless there are any editorial issues which require resolution by the G.709 editor, the amendment should be published by the end of this month (January). So, it shouldn't be long. Stephen -----Original Message----- From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: 09 January, 2013 12:16 To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12) Hello, Does anyone know when this document is going to be publicly available? Unless I missed it, I don't think IETF participants have open access to this document and it is being referenced in the g.709 drafts. Thanks, Lou _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment… Shew, Stephen
- Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment… Lou Berger