Re: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & framework
Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Thu, 08 November 2012 23:07 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF97121F88CF; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:07:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46DYyfM9lwVC; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:07:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF4F21F8831; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id qA8NCk5b004025; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:12:48 -0600
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (147.117.188.96) by eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se (147.117.20.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:07:21 -0500
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:07:20 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & framework
Thread-Index: AQHNvf60cHlHw3FCCEmcA2rB1ngL55fgiidQ
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:07:20 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112010087@EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se>
References: <509C2F21.6000301@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <509C2F21.6000301@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112010087EUSAAMB103ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & framework
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:07:33 -0000
Hi Lou, at al.,
Would the CCAMP WG host work on PM methodology? I think that accurate definition of measurement methodology to produce useful data is as important as specification of mechanisms to propagate and use them.
Regards,
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 2:16 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org; CCAMP
Subject: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & framework
In the MPLS session, we just discussed if the following drafts should go to MPLS or CCAMP:
draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-problem-statement-01
draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-06
All the chairs in the room said it was up to the AD (Loa was on Jabber, Deborah was stuck in NJ). Adrian (our AD) just leaned over and said CCAMP, and I agree. So, I think we have our answer!
Lou
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement & fra… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement &… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [CCAMP] WG for delay-loss problem-statement &… Lou Berger